Back to Blog
Networking7 min read

SD-WAN vs MPLS: Making the Right Choice

Both technologies have their place. We break down the pros, cons, and use cases to help you decide what fits your business.

The SD-WAN vs MPLS debate has been going on for years, and the answer hasn't changed: it depends. Both technologies solve different problems, and many organizations use both.

Understanding MPLS

MPLS (Multi-Protocol Label Switching) has been the gold standard for enterprise WAN connectivity for decades. It's a private network service provided by carriers that offers guaranteed performance.

MPLS Advantages

  • Guaranteed SLAs for latency, jitter, packet loss
  • Private connectivity—never touches public internet
  • Built-in QoS managed by carrier
  • Carrier-managed with proactive monitoring

SD-WAN Advantages

  • Combine MPLS, broadband, LTE and more
  • Application-aware intelligent routing
  • Centralized management dashboard
  • 30-50% cost savings potential

The Real Comparison

Cost

SD-WAN typically costs 30-50% less than equivalent MPLS bandwidth. The savings come from using commodity internet connections instead of premium private circuits.

Performance

MPLS wins on raw performance guarantees. SD-WAN can match or exceed MPLS performance when conditions are good, but internet connections are inherently variable.

Flexibility

SD-WAN wins hands down. New sites can be brought online in days instead of months. Bandwidth changes are instant. You're not locked to a single carrier.

Common Scenarios

Our Recommendation

For most Australian businesses, a hybrid approach makes the most sense: Keep MPLS for critical sites and applications, use SD-WAN with internet for less critical sites.

Best for MPLS:

  • Real-time applications requiring guaranteed performance (VoIP, video conferencing, trading systems)
  • Regulatory requirements mandating private connectivity (healthcare, finance, government sectors)
  • Locations where quality internet isn't available or reliable enough for business-critical traffic
  • Organizations with existing MPLS contracts and stable, predictable traffic patterns

Best for SD-WAN:

  • Organizations with many branch locations (10+ sites) where MPLS costs become prohibitive
  • Businesses adopting cloud applications (Office 365, Salesforce, AWS) that benefit from direct internet access
  • Companies prioritizing cost savings and flexibility over guaranteed performance SLAs
  • Organizations needing rapid site deployment (days instead of months) or frequent bandwidth changes
  • Businesses wanting centralized management and visibility across all branch networks

The Bottom Line

The "SD-WAN kills MPLS" narrative is overblown. Smart organizations use both where appropriate, saving money where they can while maintaining performance where they must.

Tags

SD-WANMPLSWANEnterprise NetworkingCloud Connectivity
SB

Signal Bend

Network Infrastructure Experts

We help Australian businesses design and implement WAN solutions that balance performance, cost, and flexibility.

Need help designing your WAN strategy?

We can assess your current setup and recommend the right mix of technologies for your business.

Schedule a Consultation

In this article

  • Understanding MPLS
  • The Real Comparison
  • Common Scenarios
  • The Bottom Line